![]() 03/15/2019 at 18:32 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
What’s interesting to me is that if you read this story on AVWeb — which got hacked today and is still recovering — they say “nose-down,” where the “mainstream” media, like LA Times, says “set to dive.” Farbeit from the media to hype something up or be other than objective...
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 03/15/2019 at 18:42 |
|
When I want to learn something about an accident, I read Avweb and other aviation related sites, not the general media.
The general media is both clueless and sensationalist and it’s annoying as he ll .
“ nose down” is more correct anyways.
![]() 03/15/2019 at 19:11 |
|
Which is more damning.
The MCAS specifically acts to force the plane into nose down attitude using the jackscrew.
![]() 03/15/2019 at 19:17 |
|
Lion Air crash report http://knkt.dephub.go.id/knkt/ntsc_aviation/baru/pre/2018/2018%20-%20035%20-%20PK-LQP%20Preliminary%20Report.pdf
![]() 03/15/2019 at 19:20 |
|
I wanted to post the AVw eb story, but because they were hacked, it was not available.
![]() 03/15/2019 at 19:21 |
|
Not. Good.
![]() 03/15/2019 at 19:26 |
|
I figured. The fact that the trim was nose down isn’t surprising really - given everything we knew already, I would have been shocked if it wasn't.
![]() 03/15/2019 at 20:33 |
|
I can imagine the editorial discussion that went into it.
So, what happens with this jackscrew thing set like that?
W ell, a 737 pilot I talked to says it puts the nose down
So, wait, if the nose is pointing down, that means the plane is basically diving straight down towards the ground, right?
Maybe, I guess, he just said it pointed the nose down.
But we can say it was in a dive, right? Nose down could be considered a dive?
Technically, yes, I guess it could be.
Then go with dive, I want it in the headline.
![]() 03/15/2019 at 22:24 |
|
Right, but without the MCAS bedeviling the pilots, perhaps the aircraft would still be flyable. Pure supposition on my part, obviously, but I think lack of experience and lack of proper training may prove to be significant contributing factors.
![]() 03/15/2019 at 22:25 |
|
No. There was no discussion, just an ignorant 25-year-old typing an entry into the part of Kinja that the LA Times uses.
![]() 03/16/2019 at 00:09 |
|
To be clear, I think it’s likely that the MCAS is what rolled in the nose down trim.
It’s very rare that an airliner crashes from only 1 cause - it takes a handful working together in most cases. MCAS failure isn’t an unrecoverable condition - but if the crew isnt trained to deal with it or doesn’t have the experience to recognize and drew with it, the consequences are absolute, apparently.
![]() 03/16/2019 at 19:47 |
|
That would be my thinking.